Blog
Topic: Your neighbor has just been diagnosed with Gastroesophageal reflux
disease (GERD). He has a lot of questions regarding the disease and treatment
options. He has gone to the following websites (see below) to do some research
and now has come to you to ask for your educated opinion. Compare and contrast
these sites in regard to the validity and reliability of their information.
What credible resources might you advise your neighbor to review? How can you
validate the credibly of a website?
According
to McGonigle & Mastrian (2015) “clinicians should be cautious when
recommending websites to patients and families, because not all sites are
reliable or valid” (p. 295). It is important for the clinician to know how to
identify websites that are credible and to recommend websites that can meet the
learning needs of the patient. One such resource that is used to identify
credible websites for health information is the Health on the Net (HON), which
was created as a platform to distribute quality health information to patients,
healthcare providers and the public as well as provide access to the most up to
date medical data via the internet (HONcode, 2015).
Comparing and Contrasting Websites
In comparing and contrasting
between Wikipedia, WebMD, and the CDC, Wikipedia- is a free encyclopedia that
can offer valuable and accurate information, but does not guarantee that the content
presented has been reviewed by experts and it cannot guarantee the validity of the
information. Wikipedia doesn’t offer any formal peer review of the content, nor
does it provide professional advice (Wikipedia, 2015). WebMD on the other hand, is certified by Honcode, is
Urac accredited, and the privacy of information is certified by Truste. WebMD provides credible, original and timely
health information content by well know providers. The contributors to the site
are board-certified
physicians, award-winning journalists, and trained community moderators. The
qualifications of all medical professionals on the site are verified; including
health professionals, experts, editorial professionals and contributors with a
specialty license (WebMD, 2015). The CDC is a website that offers information that increases
the health security of our nation by putting science into action and by providing
health information that will protect us against unnecessary and dangerous
health threats (CDC, 2014).
Credible Resources
Some
common domains used for websites are .edu - education sites, .gov - government
sites, .org - organization sites, .com - commercial sites, and .net - network
infrastructures (Montecino, 1998). In recommending a
credible website for the neighbor to use to research his condition, I would recommend
using government sites that use the domain .gov, such as the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services’ health finder site (www.healthfinder.gov), the National
Institutes of Health (http://www.nih.gov) and Medline Plus
(www.medlineplus.gov) (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015, p. 296).
Validating Websites
To validate whether the website is credible, I would direct him
to examine the web domain or URL address, and to look for the credentials of
the author or organization. According to Lane (2010) “the
author or organization should be clearly displayed on the website. If the credentials
are missing, consider this a red flag” (p. 12). I would also direct him to
determine if the website has been updated regularly and to determine what the websites
intent is, such as, is it to inform, instruct, or is it to persuade and does it
have advertisements (Lane, 2010, p. 13). Many websites that are considered
reliable will have a seal of certification from a trusted accrediting
organization such as the Health on the Net Foundation (HON). This seal of certification
verifies the websites transparency of information regarding the authority,
authorship, confidentiality, funding, and that it is up-to date, and honest
about advertising and provides a clear distinction between advertisement and
editorial content (HONcode, 2015). Doing these things
can help in determining the quality of the information presented as well as
help to ensure that the information is credible.
References
About us: What we do for our users. (2015). Retrieved from WebMD:
http://www.webmd.com/about-webmd-policies/about-what-we-do-for-our-users
General disclaimer.
(2015). Retrieved from Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer
HONcode. (2015). Retrieved
from Health on the net foundation:
http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Patients/Visitor/visitor.html
Lane, R. V. (2010). Stop! Evaluate website before use. Dental
Assistant, 79(4), 12-45.
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Nursing informatics
and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones &
Bartlett Learning.
Mission, Role, and Pledge.
(2014). Retrieved from Centers for disease control and prevention:
http://www.cdc.gov/about/organization/mission.htm
Montecino, V. (1998). Guidelines for critiquing www
resources. Retrieved from Education & Technology Resources:
http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/web-eval-sites.htm