What
should Charles do when he encounters direct contradictions in information from
two sources?
When
Charles encounters direct contradictions in formation from the two sources he
used, he should first determine how old the information is from both sources. There
has been some difficulty reported in locating websites and its content, so when
using websites, the user should determine “… is the website findable, useful,
usable, valuable, accessible, desirable and/or credible” (Gaitsgory, Burgess, & Mellis, 2013, p. 370)? By following these guidelines it will help
Charles to determine the credibility of the website and information source
used.
Which
resources are the most trusted, and how do you determine this?
The
school textbooks should be considered a trusted source in the context that it
is a school textbook, but depending on the year of the textbook, the
information could be older and there may be newer up to date information available,
especially information retrieved from a credible website.
Which
resources are the most accurate, and how do you determine this?
One
way Charles can determine if the resources he is using are the most accurate is
by using Health on the Net Foundation (HONcode). This site can help Charles
identify the authoritative qualities of the authors, whether information is
complementarity, the attribution of information, the justifiability of site to
back up claims, the transparency of the site, any financial disclosure and the
sites advertising policy. The HON was founded to help professionals, patients
and the general public to gain access to quality health information via the
internet that is relevant and up to date. The HON represents ethical standards
and displays the transparency of websites and their intent to offer quality
health information (HONcode, 2015) .
What
criteria should Charles use to identify credible resources to enhance his
clinical practice?
Criteria
Charles should use to identifying credible resources is to look at the
credentials and qualifications of the author in relation to the subject matter.
Charles should also ask himself the following questions: is the author
associated with an organization or institution and is there a link or contact
information, does the author have any peer-reviewed publications on the web or
is there a hard copy available, is the author bias, is web content up to date,
does the information presented provide references or cited works that are
credible and what type of site does the information appear on? If Charles can
answer yes to all the questions, then the website is most likely a credible
site (Montecino, 1998) .
References
Gaitsgory, O., Burgess, A., & Mellis, C. (2013). Opinion
piece: 'Medical students-learning from textbooks or electronic media?'. Journal
Of Paediatrics And Child Health, 49(9), E370-372. doi:10.1111/jpc.12180
HONcode. (2015). Retrieved
from Health on the net foundation:
http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Patients/Visitor/visitor.html
Montecino, V. (1998). Guidelines for critiquing www
resources. Retrieved from Education & Technology Resources:
http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/web-eval-sites.htm